Double Materiality Assessment explained in the Context of CSRD

In recent years, the importance of sustainability reporting has grown significantly as companies and investors to “assess and disclose non-financial information“. After quite a long period of uncertainty, the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) has emerged as a key regulatory framework guiding companies in this reporting, and it is already affecting tens of thousands of companies, with more companies being required to comply with CSRD reporting every year as the scope widends. The whole CSRD framework aims to increase corporate transparency and accountability on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and ESG reporting. A key component of the CSRD is the concept of “Double Materiality“, which expands the scope of traditional financial materiality to include environmental and social impacts – so the impact on the environment on the business and the business on the environment.

Many will now think “oh nooooo, another reporting requirement”, but if managed properly, it can actually be very helpful to companies in the long run. But before we dive into Double Materiality it might be good to understand what “Materiality” even means.

Understanding “Materiality” in Sustainability Reporting

Materiality has traditionally been a cornerstone of financial reporting, guiding companies to focus on issues that have a material impact on their financial statements. However, as sustainability issues have gained prominence, the concept of materiality has evolved to encompass a broader range of factors, giving rise to dual materiality.

Traditional financial materiality focuses on matters that affect the financial health of an organization, including revenues, costs, risks, and liabilities. These matters are important to investors and stakeholders because they directly affect financial performance and shareholder value.

Double materiality expands the traditional definition to include two distinct perspectives:

1. Financial materiality: The impact of environmental, social, and governance issues on a company’s financial condition. This includes how climate change, regulatory changes, and societal shifts affect business operations and profitability.
2. Environmental and Social Materiality: The impact of a company’s operations on the environment and society. This aspect focuses on how a company contributes to or mitigates environmental issues, such as pollution and biodiversity loss, and social issues, such as labor rights and community impacts.
   Understanding both dimensions of Double Materiality is essential for companies to accurately assess and report on the risks and opportunities that affect them and society at large.

Here are an illustrative example:

• An energy company might identify climate change policies as financially material due to their impact on operating costs and market demand.
• A textile company might identify labor rights as socially material because of the impact on its workforce and brand reputation.

The Role of the CSRD in Promoting Dual Materiality

The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is an important regulatory framework that requires comprehensive sustainability reporting by companies operating in the European Union. Its role in promoting double materiality is fundamental in shaping how companies assess and disclose their impacts on society and the environment.

Key aspects of the CSRD related to double materiality include

• Enhanced reporting requirements: The CSRD requires companies to provide detailed information on how sustainability issues affect their business operations and financial performance, as well as their impact on the environment and society. This requirement ensures that companies assess and report on both aspects of double materiality.
• Standardizing sustainability reporting: The Directive aims to standardize sustainability reporting across the EU, making it easier to compare and assess companies’ sustainability performance. This standardization is essential to ensure transparency and help stakeholders make informed decisions.
• Accountability and transparency: By requiring detailed disclosure, the CSRD holds companies accountable for their environmental and social impacts. This transparency is not only critical for regulatory compliance, but also builds trust with investors, consumers, and the community.

Benefits of CSRD for Businesses

As mentioned above, there is a new standard for reporting – for most companies this is more of a hassle than a benefit. However, I would argue that CSRD offers several key benefits to companies. First, it increases transparency by helping companies communicate their sustainability efforts and impacts in a clear and comprehensive manner. Second, it improves investor confidence as investors increasingly seek to fund companies with robust sustainability practices. Detailed reporting under the CSRD provides the data necessary to attract sustainable investment. Finally, by understanding both the financial and non-financial impacts of their operations, companies can better manage potential risks and capitalize on opportunities related to sustainability.

The integration of dual materiality into CSRD underscores the importance of considering both the economic and social/environmental dimensions of business activities, thereby broadening the overall picture under which companies develop strategies and focus on other dimensions, not just shareholder value.

Proactive use of double materiality in business

Proactively integrating Double Materiality into business strategies can significantly improve the way companies approach sustainability and navigate evolving market landscapes. By proactively applying Double Materiality, companies can make more informed strategic decisions that align with both financial and sustainability goals. A thorough double materiality assessment helps companies identify emerging risks and opportunities, allowing them to adapt business models to align with sustainability goals, ultimately improving long-term resilience and competitiveness. In addition, embracing double materiality promotes transparency, which builds stakeholder trust and reinforces the company’s commitment to sustainable practices.

This means that double materiality can be integrated in many different ways to bring added value to companies:

• Strategic Planning: Incorporating insights from double materiality assessments into strategic planning enables companies to develop sustainable business strategies that address both financial and non-financial risks.
• Product and service development: Companies can design and deliver products and services that are not only financially viable, but also environmentally and socially sustainable, meeting the evolving expectations of consumers and regulators.
• Corporate governance and risk management: Using Double Materiality insights, companies can shape their governance and risk management policies to better align with sustainability goals, promoting accountability and resilience.

The Strategic Importance of Double Materiality under the CSRD

With the CSRD emphasizing the importance of double materiality, companies are required to assess both financial and environmental/social impacts. This integrated approach helps companies understand the broader implications of their activities, not only for financial performance, but also for their impact on society and the environment. This understanding enables companies to identify sustainability issues that may affect their long-term viability.

But be aware also of the Legal and operational implications. The CSRD mandates strict reporting standards, which means companies will need to improve their data collection and reporting capabilities. This will include a lot of changes like:

• Updating internal processes to capture relevant data across the organization.
• Training employees to understand and apply double materiality concepts.
• Ensuring compliance with detailed reporting requirements to avoid legal penalties.

A simple guide to conducting dual materiality assessments

Conducting dual materiality assessments can seem daunting, but with a structured approach, companies can navigate the process effectively. Here’s a step-by-step guide:

1. Data Gathering: Collect data from multiple sources to understand the financial, environmental, and social aspects of the company’s operations. This data can come from internal reports, stakeholder feedback, regulatory requirements, and industry benchmarks.
2. Tools and methodologies: Use established assessment tools and methodologies, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) framework. These tools help structure assessments and ensure comprehensive reporting.
3. Stakeholder engagement: Engage with stakeholders, including investors, employees, customers, and communities, to understand their concerns and expectations. Surveys, interviews, and focus groups can provide valuable insight into what issues are important to them.
4. Assess and prioritize material issues: Analyze the data collected to identify issues that are material from both a financial and environmental/social perspective. Use scoring and prioritization techniques to identify the most material issues.
5. Develop a reporting framework: Based on the assessment, develop a reporting framework that is aligned with recognized standards such as GRI or SASB. This ensures that the company’s sustainability reports are comprehensive, comparable, and compliant.
6. Continuous monitoring and improvement: Establish processes for ongoing monitoring of material issues. As the business environment and stakeholder expectations evolve, reassess materiality on a regular basis to ensure that the company remains aligned with emerging trends.

Challenges and Solutions

Implementing double materiality assessments can present several challenges, but understanding these obstacles and exploring potential solutions can facilitate smoother adoption and more effective sustainability practices.

• Complexity of integration: For companies new to sustainability reporting, integrating double materiality into existing processes can be daunting. The best solution may be to start with smaller pilots in key business areas to gradually incorporate double materiality concepts, reducing complexity and allowing teams to build expertise incrementally.
• Data collection and quality: Collecting comprehensive and accurate financial, environmental, and social data is often challenging due to disparate data sources and systems. As a result, companies are encouraged to invest in robust data management systems to improve data collection, storage, and analysis. Leveraging technology can streamline this process and make data more accessible and actionable.
• Stakeholder engagement: Engaging a diverse group of stakeholders, each with their own unique interests and concerns, can be complex. One solution may be to develop clear communication strategies to regularly engage stakeholders and help align their expectations with the company’s sustainability goals. Regular updates can foster a sense of partnership and ensure that the company remains aligned with stakeholder priorities.
• Resource allocation: For many companies, especially smaller ones, dedicating sufficient resources to double materiality assessments can be a challenge. While most smaller companies (fewer than 250 employees) may not be required to report, it is advisable to focus on prioritizing the most impactful areas when allocating resources to ensure maximum return on investment. Working with external partners can extend available resources and bring in additional expertise, which can help reduce costs and increase effectiveness.

Conclusion

Double materiality is becoming increasingly important in sustainability reporting, and the CSRD will affect many companies by requiring a broader understanding of their impacts. This concept expands traditional financial materiality by encouraging companies to assess how external factors affect them, while also considering the impact of their operations on the wider world. So suddenly it is not just about shareholders – suddenly stakeholders including our environment plus the impact of choosing the right/wrong partners and supply chain will have an impact on the business.

While some may view this as a burdensome regulatory requirement that requires additional time and resources, others see it as an opportunity for strategic advantage. By proactively integrating Double Materiality into their strategies, companies can manage emerging risks and seize opportunities, especially as customers and investors increasingly value responsible business practices and sustainability becomes a more pressing issue.

To remain competitive and meet evolving expectations, companies should embrace Double Materiality not just as a compliance necessity, but as a framework for improving their strategic decision-making. Understanding both financial and non-financial impacts enables companies to operate responsibly, build stronger relationships with stakeholders, and ultimately position themselves for long-term success.

Author: Benjamin Talin, CEO MoreThanDigital

MoreThanDigital Insights

MoreThanDigital Insights is like a health check for your business. It looks at over 300 parts of your business, from financials to even aspects like company culture. It gives you clear data to help you see where you're doing well and where you can improve. You can also compare your business with other businesses or your industry. All of this is easy to understand and use, even for your team. And the best part? It's a powerful tool to help you make better business decisions and the basic version is FREE FOR EVERYONE.